Live from the AAMC , part 1 of 2.
For the next two episodes, the hosts step away from their usual format and present six ‘Classic’ papers (3 per episode). During each session, the hosts ask the audience to vote on which paper they found to be most deserving of the ‘classic’ #meded paper title. Listen in here to see if you agreed!
Classic” Meded Paper Defined:
- archetypal and high-impact;
- highly cited or major influence on discourses of meded;
- underpins subsequent work or thinking about meded
- influential
In this episode:
1. Barrows HS. A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Med Educ. 1986;20(6):481-486. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x
2. Colliver JA, Conlee MJ, Verhulst SJ, Dorsey JK. Reports of the decline of empathy during medical education are greatly exaggerated: a reexamination of the research. Acad Med. 2010;85(4):588-593. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d281dc
3. Van der Vleuten CP, Norman GR, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability. Med Educ. 1991;25(2):110-118. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00036.x
The views and opinions expressed in this post and podcast episode are those of the host(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. For more details on our site disclaimers, please see our ‘About’ page
