Live from the AAMC , Part 2.
For these two special episodes, the hosts step away from their usual format and present six ‘Classic’ papers (3 per episode). Check out Part 1 here. They define classic papers as ones that are high impact, archetypal, and influential (that is, highly cited or that have altered their discourse/practice). During these sessions, the hosts asked the audience to vote on which paper they found to be most deserving of the ‘classic’ #meded paper title. Listen to Part 2 to see if their choices lined up with yours!
In this episode:
4. Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Med Teach. 2016;38(8):769-786. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851
5. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706-711. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119
6. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70-S81. doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
The views and opinions expressed in this post and podcast episode are those of the host(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. For more details on our site disclaimers, please see our ‘About’ page
